How is the ongoing progress in Iraq not a good thing, for Bush, for McCain, and for the world in general? - general nil
The Iraqi security forces to the point that the control, but a few isolated parts of the country's oil industry to generate revenue to rebuild the country improved, the two religious groups are not at war with each other, the Support Al-Qaeda has been reduced to zero, the United States has strong diplomatic ties with the Iraqi government, it seems, that connect the main part of the United States at the end of next year to retirement.
What all this is a victory for Bush, an affirmation of his policies and McCain in the past two years and a defeat for the appeals court, "the children a number n on the Democratic side of the fence? Does this mean that" staying the course "was the right decision?
Monday, February 15, 2010
General Nil How Is The Ongoing Progress In Iraq Not A Good Thing, For Bush, For McCain, And For The World In General?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
You're a better person that you are leaving a punch in the nose and the other person can say, "Sorry, we did not do." Then to go for a walk ...
This is the mentality of the Left. Regardless of the fact that Saddam had 17 of the UN resolution was ignored. It is better to run away and just let it continue to sell the Air Force fire the weapons inspectors, etc. ..
Now talk about when we do.
After all, cut and run in Vietnam, while 2 million innocent people died and 12 million have lost their homes, the United States has been to very good. What if you develop a "Paper Tiger" nickname implementation terrorists think they can nickel and dime you to death with an attack unanswered in this building, oror ship of war and the barracks?
Who cares anyway?
No, victory in Iraq is bad news for left-liberal. The story will be treated as they deserve.
Its funny how fast the fire will occur when the opponent more than 40,000 is M16.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/aug ...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/oct ...
was the fire that has nothing to do with "the course" what he meant to. Everything about the course we spent 12 billion euros per month. Democratic side of the fence? Where is it?
How Obama is the target has given rise to many a victory for Bush / McCain and his dream of a permanent military occupation of Iraq?
The Iraqis have come together, have criticized the Bush / McCain, they are forced to accept a timetable for withdrawal, McCain has vowed never to happen, and the troops as soon as Obama planned.
This proves that Obama was right.
As the progress in Iraq is not good for Bush, McCain, and the world in general?
Do you want the same question after the conquest by Russia in Georgia? If not, why not? not to their expectations of the Russian landing on our doorstep? LOL,
Oops! fast response and further from his det, S;
My answer lies with sneering condescending polemic, that is!
Despite the despair of losing gone to America to war, and run with your tail between your legs, things have improved (since the rise that Barack Obama against Milhaus). Milhaus points away from the simplicity and how unfit for command.
In the words of El Lobo: "We will not suck d * cks not yet."
I agree with you, but I think you overestimate the ability of Iraqi security forces. Despite significant successes, it remains to be done.
Show me the evidence of this progress, because I can not prove the contrary, a larger hole to hell, where the U.S. has decided, Superman http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTMp play YNaD ...
Oh, is that reading the source, I'm not going into details. BTW Harry Potter books do not count as non-fiction.
This is just one example of how the left will never honor to whom honor is due. I Heard the news today that the United States and Iraq a deadline for the withdrawal of the table with the reality of working life have made more.
Personally, I see that the development of Iraq makes a problem for Obama. I think he started his campaign on Iraq and said I would take time, tables, etc. .. Well, this has already happened, if you no longer use really.
For a stable Iraq is against the will of the Democrats in power. Rather take a few more space and lost the United States, in the opposite direction.
Post a Comment